Find patentability scores using patent numbers
Determine emotion from text
Classify patent abstracts into subsectors
Analyze sentiment of articles about trading assets
Generate topics from text data with BERTopic
Analyze sentences for biased entities
Open LLM(CohereForAI/c4ai-command-r7b-12-2024) and RAG
Use title and abstract to predict future academic impact
Search for philosophical answers by author
Easily visualize tokens for any diffusion model.
Humanize AI-generated text to sound like it was written by a human
Classify text into categories
Explore and filter language model benchmark results
The Harvard-USPTO Patentability-Score is a tool designed to analyze and evaluate the patentability of inventions by calculating a score based on specific criteria. It leverages text analysis technologies to determine the likelihood of a patent being granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). This score provides valuable insights for inventors, researchers, and legal professionals to assess the strength and potential of their patent applications.
• Automatic Patentability Score Calculation: Generates a score based on patent text analysis to predict the likelihood of patent approval.
• Multi-Patent Analysis: Allows users to evaluate multiple patents simultaneously for comparative analysis.
• Detailed Reporting: Provides in-depth insights into the factors affecting patentability, such as novelty, non-obviousness, and utility.
• Integration with USPTO Database: Utilizes real-time data from the USPTO to ensure accurate and up-to-date evaluations.
What is the purpose of the Harvard-USPTO Patentability-Score?
The purpose is to provide a quantitative measure of a patent's likelihood of approval, helping users assess its strength and potential.
Can I analyze multiple patents at once?
Yes, the tool supports multi-patent analysis, allowing users to compare and evaluate multiple patents simultaneously.
What factors are considered in the patentability score?
The score is based on text analysis of the patent application, focusing on criteria such as novelty, non-obviousness, utility, and clarity of the claims and descriptions.