Browse and submit evaluations for CaselawQA benchmarks
Benchmark LLMs in accuracy and translation across languages
Pergel: A Unified Benchmark for Evaluating Turkish LLMs
Generate and view leaderboard for LLM evaluations
Browse and submit language model benchmarks
Explore and submit models using the LLM Leaderboard
View and submit LLM evaluations
Calculate memory needed to train AI models
Evaluate adversarial robustness using generative models
Browse and submit model evaluations in LLM benchmarks
Open Persian LLM Leaderboard
Explain GPU usage for model training
Create demo spaces for models on Hugging Face
CaselawQA leaderboard (WIP) is a tool designed for browsing and submitting evaluations for the CaselawQA benchmarks. It serves as a platform to track and compare performance of different models on legal question-answering tasks. The leaderboard is currently a work in progress, with ongoing updates to improve functionality and user experience.
• Benchmark Browse: Explore and view performance metrics for various models on CaselawQA benchmarks.
• Submission Portal: Easily submit your model's results for evaluation.
• Comparison Tools: Compare model performance across different metrics and tasks.
• Filtering Options: Narrow down results by specific criteria such as model type or benchmark version.
• Version Tracking: Track changes in model performance over time.
• Community Sharing: Share insights and discuss results with other users.
What is the purpose of the CaselawQA leaderboard?
The leaderboard is designed to facilitate model evaluation and comparison for legal question-answering tasks, helping researchers and developers track progress in the field.
Do I need specific expertise to use the leaderboard?
While some technical knowledge is helpful, the platform is designed to be accessible to both experts and newcomers. Detailed instructions and guidelines are provided for submissions.
How are submissions evaluated?
Submissions are evaluated based on predefined metrics for the CaselawQA benchmarks, ensuring consistency and fairness in comparisons. Results are typically updated periodically.